Even Remington loyalists have a tough time choosing between the Remington 783 and the Remington 700. While both are tough guns, you need to consider their differences, or you risk purchasing the wrong one.
We’ve done the legwork for you and compared these two rifles in an in-depth test.
Rem 783 Advantages
Rem 700 Advantages
Feature of Both Guns
While comparing the design of Remington 783 vs 700, we have deduced that one can’t really outperform the other because both systems were built for their own purposes.
The 783 follows more innovative design directives that are decades ahead of other creations when it comes to barrel making, materials used, and other manufacturing details. It has a modifiable crossfire trigger, a pillar-embedded stock, and a free-floating barrel.
The Remington 700, on the other hand, was firmly designed for mass production. There’s a bolt face surrounding the cartridge that’s activated by a coil spring, adding a nice function to the rifle. The stock, barrel, and the recoil pad is the same as the other model.
A minimal flaw we noticed with the 700 is that it takes a little time to replace the firing pin. Other than that, the design is great.
The Remington 783 VS 700 accuracy results don’t have a very wide gap. When we took them to the range, we got great results from their performance.
The one-piece cylindrical receiver on the 783 has more mass and rigidity passing through, boosting the accuracy of the rifle. Its magnum contoured barrel is a 22-inch or 24-inch button-rifled that’s fitted with a barrel nut. And while the trigger is factory set at 3.5 pounds, you can adjust it to your preferences.
The accuracy of the Remington 700 is impressive as well. The lighter trigger contributes to this, and its performance brings 100-yard groups smaller than one inch. In our tests, the 168gr bullets produced the best results.
But comparing the two models, the Remington 700 provides a significantly better accuracy right out of the box. Many shooters, including us, favor the 700 over the model 783 in this aspect. But of course, a marksman must also consider his aim and positioning when it comes to hitting targets.
Loading and Magazines
Model 700 is a top loading gun, meaning no metal is going over the top or the bolt. Unlike the model 783, it’s not magazine fed, which helps shooters load faster by creating a fixed frame from a smaller ejection port.
As for the Remington 783, it’s highly capable of reducing machining time through the help of its metal, detachable box magazines. This only requires placing them at the bottom of the rifle and giving a snap afterwards. Due to convenience, this is a massive advantage for the model 783 compared to the 700 model.
Modifications and upgrades are always a big consideration for serious enthusiasts. It should be easy to find firing pin assemblies, box magazine replacements, rails, bolts, and other upgrades.
In this aspect, the Remington 700 wins over the Remington 783. As mentioned, the former is made for mass production, and its popularity through the years has made it one of the most time-tested rifles in the market. This gives shooters a ton of customization options to choose from .
The Remington 783 model, on the other hand, has its own upgrades but the options are limited compared to what you can find with the 700. If you prioritize personalization and improvements, the Remington 700 is the better choice.
Compared to most guns, the Remington 783 is equipped with an adjustable crossfire trigger which allows you to modify the trigger pull weight at around 2.5 to 5 pounds. You’ll also find a finger safety in the trigger blade and a gel-filled SuperCell pad which is crucial in minimizing the recoil.
On the field, the rifle is suitable for any hand since it has a synthetic pillar bedded beefy stock that provides a natural grip. This rifle is lightweight as well, so it’s a great option for hunters who need portability for long distances.
On the other hand, Remington 700 has also set the bar high by being one of the best and most affordable rifles available in the market. The lighter trigger is a great feature, and the bolt runways are the essence of the Remington model. There’s also a steel sling stud and a safety lock behind the receiver for zero unwanted trigger pull. Overall, the experience is strong and smooth.
Shooters can also add any rifle parts to the 700 since it has more aftermarket upgrade options. Although these accessories are cheap, they greatly help in developing the rifle’s performance. However, keep in mind that choosing the right scope will be crucial in this rifle because it comes with a two lug design.
Finally, let’s end this Remington 783 VS 700 comparison by talking about price. As said earlier, the qualities of these two say a lot more than what’s on their price tags. Put side by side with others at the same price point, these models stand out.
However, in comparison with each other, the Remington 700 is still more expensive than the 783. It has an approximate cost of about $400 to a maximum of $2,500, while Remington 783 ranges only around $300 to $500.
There is a huge maximum price gap but these are undoubtedly more affordable than other models since both can be bought at almost the same prices. Plus, if their capacity is being talked about, they have lots to boast about in that area.
Conclusion: Rem 783 or 700?
When it comes to the Remington 783 vs 700 debate, the winner really depends on what you need as a shooter. These two models weren’t made to compete with each other, as they both provide good features for different purposes.
The Remington 783 model is best for shooters who want durability, ruggedness, less recoil, good price, and portability during long hunts.
The Remington 700 is best for out-of-the-box accuracy, customization options, faster loading times, and an overall smooth operation.